Europe can be
declared sunk in crisis and now groping for remedies, America is
still struggling and could possibly soon return to protectionism out
of desperation to fix problems, particularly the rising unemployment.
Then there is the challenge from an unstoppable China with whom
almost every nation is eager to improve their ties and those who
haven't done so are willing to initiate. Unlike the western tactics
of carrots and stick ,China has been dealing with the
poverty-stricken African nations under the glare of torrential
Western criticisms. Could it be jealousy? Could it be the rise of a
long-considered looming threat they have long dreaded?
The healthy
European Union members will soon be dragged down by the ailing ones,
Britain which seemingly was considered to be on the path of recovery
is now crawling and its once-mighty colonial power is less formidable
than it could display in Falkland. It will take time for America to
bounce back and if it does, which is highly likely considering its
flexible labour markets, unlike the EU, it will then be in a position
to realise that the country bled too long by wars without getting
anywhere close to calculated booties.
With a too
stretched army and a shrinking economy its its base camps across
the globe will be compelled shut down like the Roman outposts.
Drone attacks, Navy Seal operations, recommended but also contested,
will be instrumental in policing for a while.
Few days ago the
BBC broadcast a documentary on how the English language was losing
its momentum in countries like Singapore and Malaysia, countries
where the language was the lingua franca. The challenge is enormous
and what's is more fascinating is the defiant characteristic of
Singlish patois and the way in which Singaporeans use it regardless
of how it is seen. The queen's language is there , it certainly
prevails in offices and at public gatherings, but it can't be the
language to which people can naturally relate to.
In this global
topsy turvy one can say where the Indian elephant fits in though
people, foreign businessmen and super rich Indians, have been much
gung-ho about its developments. The absence of political wills, the
seemingly incorrigible caste mentality which most people pretend
doesn't exist when they are in the metros while it hangs thick in
their homes, the few big lies of fundamental rights deceiving its
own people run counter developmental intention.
And the picture
even becomes gloomier when one understands that the elephant nation
hasn't produced a real charismatic leader so far, and it's unlikely
considering the moronic admiration and slavish loyalty people have
for dynastic politics. It's a self-defeating thing and apparently
runs counter to what the country as a democratic one should be. The
working force will naturally grow as the population has been breeding
healthily, but the quality of it will be a question.
When it comes to
human rights records one would prefer India to be either a communist
or an autocratic state where one, at least, knows what to expect,
rather than being in a democracy with closets full of its people's
skeletons; a nation only capable of saying beautiful and humane-like
things and doing just the opposite.
With a population
more educated and the quality of it bound to enhance there is hope
for Chinese society to experience more freedom. But I wouldn't
conclude that the country should be seen as an absolute role model,
instead it's a country to be admired to an extent and a super power
to be reckoned with.
This kind of
global balance is definitely useful and does only more good; another
Vietnam and unilateral carpet bombings will not easily happen . The
West will give a second thought over any global intervention, they
wouldn't be given unbridled liberty to indulge is mischief.
Imagine a ravaged
world right after WW2, a world pocketed by victorious few, every
nation , every individual looked up the Western world as though they
had too many Lawrenes and invincible Solomons. They are as good as
any other people, as imperfect as many others.
So, it can be
summed up this way: Europe will emerge as the sick man of the world
and after its recovery it will be more disintegrated with the
Germans asking why they were being dragged into a financial abyss,
the wounded cocky America will be confined to certain areas. It
could possibly land up with certain domestic problems: a rising
Hispanic population exerting for more, the black on the same platform
where the white have been, Indians and other Asians will have more
confidence and they will do more to make their presence feel since
the rise of two super powers in Asia will boost the confidence in
them. This could augment the rise of another Ku Klux Klan like
movement among a pushed-out and dumbfounded white minority.
London, New York
will be reduced to some tourist cities ,visited for their structures
,rather than vibrant global financial hubs as the bourses in Asian
markets will trade in much larger scales; Shanghai and Beijing will
expect the world to use more of Mandarin and the world will as their
leaders continue to hold enormous respect for their language.
Pakistan will be a
serious troublemaker in the sub-continent with its nuclear arsenals
in its disposal, surging fundamentalism which was sown during General
Zia-Uh-Hug, and eventually it could possibly become a rough state
controlled in province wise by tribal chiefs, Sunnis and Shias, and army repenting its active contribution in destruction.
Where
does India stand in this; the country will face steep rise in defense
budget to tackle potential cross-border threats. If the people from
the mainland succeed in overrunning those in the North-Eastern part
of the country like the Hans have done to others in China, then the
region could be peaceful with the natives beaten down and buried for
good just like in Tripura or the Red Indians in Both Americas.
Disparity
would widen more and chaotic urbanization would add more trouble with
cities unable to hold people, but the cities will definitely become
bigger with satellite cities at their peripheries. Why India will be
still in deep trouble, because of it lack of commitment towards
constructive education and lack of investment in R&D facilities
and its self-defeating lies.
Comments
Post a Comment